WHY PLASTIC LANDFILL LINERS ALWAYS FAIL.
In the landfill business, government and industry say plastic
liners are going to save the day. For example, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and industry both argue
that incinerator ash can be safely "disposed of" in a
double-lined ash "monofill." A "monofill" is a landfill that
contains only ash, no raw garbage. Like any other landfill, the
basic design is a bathtub in the ground. The bottom of the
bathtub is formed by a huge sheet of plastic. In an expensive
landfill, you have two sheets of plastic separated by about two
feet of sand and gravel--thus creating one bathtub inside
another bathtub. Therefore, a doublelined ash monofill is a
landfill (which is really just a polite word for a dump) in the
form of a bathtub created by two plastic liners, containing
incinerator ash and nothing else.
The theory behind the monofill is that ash contains only
small amounts of aggressive organic chemicals that might eat a
hole in the plastic liner, so the plastic liner will remain
intact and protect us against the lead and cadmium and other
toxic metals contained in the ash. (See #92.) As always, the key
question is: what is the duration of the hazard and what is the
duration of the protection provided by the plastic liner? (The
"cap" or umbrella covering a landfill will also be made of the
same plastic, so a landfill is really a "baggie" in the ground,
containing toxins. What is the lifetime of this baggie? How long
will it protect us?)
What is the duration and nature of the hazard from metals in
incinerator ash? As we saw earlier (in #92) incinerator
ash is rich in toxic metals. For example, it typically contains
anywhere from 3000 parts per million (ppm) to 30,000 ppm of
lead. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region (Boston), and
the Harvard University School of Public Health have recommended
a cleanup action level of 1000 ppm for lead in soil--in other
words, they recommended that remedial action, as would be needed
at a Superfund site, should be undertaken wherever lead in soils
exceeds 1000 ppm. [1] In recommending the 1000 ppm action level,
EPA and Harvard wrote, "While we believe a greater margin of
safety would be achieved with an action level of 500 ppm, we
think it necessary to set priorities for remedial activity."
(What they meant was that there are so many places in urban
America where there is 500 ppm lead in soil that EPA would be
overwhelmed with work if 500 ppm were set as the threshold for
remedial action--so 1000 ppm is a more "realistic" cleanup
action level even though it's not as safe as the nation's
children really need it to be.)
Given that EPA Region I and the Harvard School of Public
Health have recommended that Superfund-type cleanup be initiated
whenever soils contain more than 1000 parts per million (ppm) of
lead, we know immediately that every ash monofill will have to
be cleaned up at some time in the future because all incinerator
ash contains more than 1000 ppm lead. (Ash also contains
dangerous amounts of other toxic metals--cadmium, arsenic,
chromium, and perhaps others, so lead is not the only reason why
a cleanup might be needed.) Therefore, when we create ash
monofills we know we are creating Superfund sites that our
children will pay for--either in damage to their brains and
nervous systems, or in enormous outlays of money--or both.
Because lead and cadmium and other metals never degrade into
anything else, but remain toxic forever, the duration of the
hazard is perpetual, everlasting, eternal. The danger will never
go away.
The incineration industry, and its acolytes in government,
argue that the plastic liners will protect us and our children
forever. Unfortunately, this idea is based on a misunderstanding
(or more likely an intentional misrepresentation) of what
happens to plastics as they get older. Plastics are not inert;
they do not stay the same as time passes. They change. They come
apart spontaneously.
A recent book by Deborah Wallace, Ph.D., describes this
process well.[2] The book is about the dangers of plastics in
fires, but in telling the story of "Why today's fires are so
dangerous," (the answer is because burning plastics give off
toxic gases that kill people who breathe them), Dr. Wallace
included a section on the makeup of plastics at the molecular
level, which helps us understand why all plastics eventually
fall apart.
The building blocks of plastics are found in natural gas,
coal, and wood, but the major source is oil. Oil (like coal and
natural gas) is a mixture of molecules of different sizes and
structures. To separate out the different molecules, crude oil
is distilled in an oil refinery. The oil is boiled and smaller,
lighter molecules are separated from the larger, heavier
molecules. The heavier molecules are then "cracked" to break up
the large, heavy molecules into smaller, lighter molecules.
The result of this distillation and cracking is organic
chemicals, which is the name for chemicals containing carbon and
other elements (chiefly hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen). These
organic chemicals form the building blocks of pesticides, glues,
and plastics. Other chemicals (such as chlorine and lead) are
added to give the raw materials new characteristics (strength,
stiffness, color, and so forth).
After the building blocks are manufactured, they are turned
into plastic resin by a process called polymerization. A polymer
is a large, organic, chain-like molecule made of repeated units
of smaller molecules. Polymerization usually requires heating
the raw materials in the presence of helper chemicals called
catalysts, until the building blocks form long chains. Even with
the catalysts, a great deal of heat is used in the
polymerization process. "Because of this heat, the long chains,
even during manufacture, may decompose slightly and have defect
points along them," Dr. Wallace explains. The defect points are
in the chemical bonds, which absorb the energy used in the
manufacturing process. The law of conservation of energy states
that the amount of energy in a system after the reaction is the
same as the amount of energy before the reaction. The large
amounts of energy (heat) thus must go somewhere; they go into
the bonds between the atoms of the plastic and are stored there.
But nature does not favor this gain of energy--nature favors low
energy chemical bonds, and high energy bonds tend to release
their energy by breaking spontaneously. These are defect points.
Although polymer scientists have striven to reduce the number of
defect points, they have not been able to completely eliminate
them from synthetic polymers.
Dr. Wallace continues, "The physical and chemical defects
that are produced by ordinary processes in the manufacture and
use of plastics demonstrate the fragile and unstable character
of these long chains of molecules that are joined by high energy
chemical bonds. When the resin is further processed to become
the finished marketable product, additional defect points are
created because the product is again heated and handled."
As time passes, plastics decompose--their molecules come
apart spontaneously--beginning at the defect points. Polymer
scientists refer to this decomposition as "aging." All plastics
"age" and there is nothing that can be done about it. Within a
few years (at most a few decades), all plastics degrade, come
apart, and fail. They become brittle, lose their strength,
crack, break into fragments. At that point, any protection the
plastic may have afforded against the toxic dangers lurking in
an ash monofill is gone. By that time, the people who created
the ash monofill will have taken their profits and left town,
but the deadly residues they leave behind--the ash--will remain
to plague the community forever, poisoning the community's
children with toxic lead and other metals.
The only affordable solution to this problem is a simple one:
prevent the creation of incinerator ash.
--Peter Montague, Ph.D. =============== [1] P.L.
Ciriello and T. Goldberg, "Lead-contaminated Soil Cleanup Draft
Report" which appears as Appendix E in: Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry, THE NATURE AND EXTENT OF LEAD
POISONING IN CHILDREN IN THE UNITED STATES: A REPORT TO CONGRESS
(Atlanta, Ga: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry,
Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services [1600 Clifton Rd. -Mail Stop E-33, Atlanta, Ga 30333;
phone (404) 639-0730], July, 1988). Free while supplies last."
[2] Deborah Wallace, IN THE MOUTH OF THE
DRAGON (Garden City Park, NY: Avery Publishing Group [120 Old
Broadway, Garden City Park, NY 11040; phone (516) 741-2155],
1990). $17.95.
Descriptor terms: epa; landfilling; plastic liners; harvard
university school of public health; studies; remedial action;
ash monofills; toxic metals; deborah wallace; polymerization;
leaks;
|